Radical Honesty by Brad Blanton



I was blown away by this brilliant book; it totally had me hooked. The author puts the boot straight into the curse of moralism as the cause of our obsessive self-critical thinking and resulting inability to be free to be ourselves, and act instinctively instead of regimentally. He cites two modern-day institutions as prime examples that perpetuate moralism: lawyers and the legal system, and the Catholic church; both of which are rich sources of clients in his psychotherapy practice. By pushing doctrines and sets of rules about what’s right and wrong, and how people should behave, these institutions and others like them enslave people to black-and-white thinking that goes against the inherent contradictions of life as a human being.

The result is that we end up stuck in our head, beating ourselves up over natural behaviour and trying to work out analytically what behaviour we think is right, rather than actually living authentically. Along the way, we learn to lie when what we want to say and do differs from what other uptight people around us seem to deem acceptable. We end up thinking this will gain us approval from other people and give us a problem-free life. In fact, we end up dissociated from ourselves, disconnected from other people, and stressed out… all in a vain attempt to avoid offending people whose opinion doesn’t really matter anyway, and the resulting conflict which we imagine will be unbearable.

Liberation of our beings from the constraints of our mind turns out to be simple: start telling the truth, and deal with the consequences. Blanton breaks truth-telling down into 3 levels:

  1. Revealing the facts
  2. Honesty about current thoughts and feelings
  3. Admitting that we are not who we have been pretending to be

Each succeeding level leads to greater openness, vulnerability, connection with others, and authenticity. Along with greater potential for conflict with defensive people operating out of fear on a lower level. Staying at level 3 all the time is hard work, and pretty much impossible. Level 2 is achievable, and gives you huge relationship breakthroughs. Most people don’t even operate at level 1 most of the time.

My family of origin didn’t even do level 1 very well. Most of my parent’s arguments were disagreements about facts revealed in previous arguments. That meant they never even got close to level 2. If you’re attacked about your version of the facts, you’re not about to reveal feelings which are even more intangible and open to ridicule, if that’s what your opponent is into. So I grew up learning that being fundamentally honest wasn’t really a good thing. I fooled myself into thinking that I was an honest, nice guy; when in fact I held back so much that I was downright deceptive and even manipulative. I didn’t know that a man can get his needs met by being open and honest about them, so I learned to withhold and lie instead. I just did it in a way that seemed nice enough and wouldn’t fit most people’s definition of a lie, but really I was holding back big time; something I’m still learning to break out of.

The chapter on dealing with anger was particularly illuminating for me. If you find yourself never getting angry, it’s possible that you’ve repressed your anger so much that you barely even feel it. This has definitely been the case for me, as my mother was verbally abusive and my father violent when they were angry; so I vowed never to follow them as role models. But men who are incapable of expressing anger act like unattractive wimps. The antidote to this is to start expressing your resentment to people, and get over your fear of how they will respond. I recently told a woman that I resented her for keeping me waiting when I turned up for a lunch date; something I previously would not have done for fear of offending. Not only did she apologize, but even though it clearly made her feel bad, she became much more engaged in our interaction as a result.

A key point that Blanton makes is that emotions are transitory when they are freely expressed. They only hang around when we bottle them up. So if we express anger towards someone else in a constructive manner, it dissipates. We need to be aware of this when we’re on the receiving end too; just because someone is angry today doesn’t mean they will still be tomorrow. This has been another big learning for me, having experienced many family arguments where an emotion, opinion or attitude expressed at one point in time is used as ammunition for all future arguments. Don’t take other people’s feelings personally. Someone can be angry with us right now, and loving us a minute later. This sharing of emotions, even of seemingly negative ones, builds intimacy, trust, and allows opportunities for forgiveness. Of course it needs to be done constructively, and the book gives a formula for doing this especially with anger, since it’s the emotion we often struggle with expressing constructively.

Radical honesty can be disarming, but is ultimately attractive to other people. We end up having more respect for someone who is honest and straight with us, even if they disagree with them or find their opinions or emotions questionable, than someone who is hard to pin down or changes their tune according to other people’s views. I highly recommend this book to anyone who finds themselves holding back around other people, and wants to live a more connected, less self-critical life. It’s absolute gold.

List Price:$15.00 USD
New From:$8.89 In Stock
Used from:$3.52 In Stock

buyamzon button Radical Honesty by Brad Blanton

No related posts.

Liked this post? Subscribe to get more like it via email.

About Graham

I'm a writer with an interest in communication, personal development and emotional well-being.
This entry was posted in Communication and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Radical Honesty by Brad Blanton

  1. Pingback: Austin Parry Thoughts

  2. Hi Graham,
    The interesting awareness is that it is hard to pin down just what the facts are your number 1. "Revealing the facts".
    Moralism or absolutism, as mentioned in your review, has a belief that there is only one truth, this truth is usually defined by the people in power and they own the franchise.
    The question, "what is truth", is challenging. A now retired Anglican Archbishop, Dr Keith Rayner, in a lecture to clergy commented when asked a question about the absolute truth that is connected to moralism stated that," I believe there is an absolute truth, I also believe that no one can know it. therefore I have to be open to the truth in the other person's error and also the error in my own truth."
    In my coaching I spend a large amount of time assisting my clients to be totally honest with themselves as they search for the error in their perceived truth, (this definitely removes arrogance and moralistic crusades from the agenda.
    Then we move to the other side and search for the truth in the other persons error. This enables them to see that there is good in everyone and that there is always something to learn from the other point of view.
    In fact this combined awareness is the beginning of a form of leadership that will finally break down our present polarity/dualistic models. Models that do black & white, right & wrong, good & evil, win & lose.
    Some of these are politics, religion, the law, the medical model, any system where the focus is on preservation rather than change.
    Unfortunately those who champion these have a lot invested in their continued existence and much to lose if they change. Money, power, prestige just to mention a few.
    Fortunately Brad and yourself, along with people like Ken Wilber, (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_Theory), Andrew Cohen, (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Cohen_%28spiritual_teacher%29) are starting to have an influence on a growing group of people like us, who are questioning this old model.
    It is so hard for humanity to face the reality of living at numbers 2 & 3 from your comments. In a position of vulnerability the brain is massively challenged, it wants security, it wants certainty, it works full on to cover our backside.
    Until we are open to acknowledge this and take greater ownership for our brain then one form of control will replace another. There are also great steps being taken to encourage and empower us to do this.
    The work of the Neuroleadership Institute is at the forefront of taking the latest awareness of the brain and moving it into conventional business usage. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroleadership)
    Keep up the good work Graham, your ability to succinctly summarise an authors ideas
    in your reviews is great.

    • Graham says:

      Thanks for the comment Austin; I appreciate the wisdom you have to share from your own journey. The nature of truth is a bit of a philosophical can of worms, but I believe what Brad is talking about in Radical Honesty is revealing facts about ourselves which aren't really questionable; it's just that we hide actions we aren't proud of in our attempt to present a facade to the world which we think will be more acceptable than the real thing. In doing so, we perpetuate shame, neurosis, and low self-esteem. When we start being more honest with others, it forces us to be more honest with ourselves too; similar to your experience with your clients. Your other comments are interesting too; I rarely see anything as black-and-white, but some of my acting training has suggested that strong points of view help build (or at least project) confidence, which is a valuable asset. I'm leaning more towards taking a stand on things I'm not absolutely certain about, where in the past I've avoided doing so because deep down I was really just trying to avoid conflict and the risk of publicly getting something wrong, and feeling shame as a result. And yes, I do think the more we understand how our brains work and what their strengths and limitations are, the better we can use them and ultimately the happier we'll be.

  3. Sharon Cullington says:

    Great work G. X

  4. Thanks for the rave review, and thanks for articulating some of the points of my book better than I did.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge